It's not too late. You will need the latest version of Flash to view the interactive site.
  • Changes in the Seismic Code
  • Staying on Track With the Code
  • A Shadow Molding Solution for Seismic Zones
  • Seismic Design Timeline
  • Understanding the New Seismic Requirements for Ceilings
  • Help for Customers with Seismic Questions
  • Seismic FAQs
  • Insight into the Seismic Code Writing Process


GENERAL BENEFITS  |   ARCHITECTS  |   CONTRACTORS  |   CODE OFFICIALS

> WATCH THE SEISMIC SHAKEDOWN VIDEO

Standard Seismic Applications Guide - IBC Category C View Construction Details
Standard Seismic Applications Guide - IBC Category D, E, F View Construction Details
Alternate Seismic Applications Guide - IBC Category C View Construction Details
Alternate Seismic Applications Guide - IBC Category D, E, F View Construction Details
Don't Know Your Seismic Design Category? Here's How To Find Out
© 2006 USG Corporation - All rights reserved usg.com contact usg legal privacy
Watch: Full version 2-minute version Side-by-side version

Test Parameter Overview

    USG Test Assembly
  • No spreader bars or perimeter hanger wires were used
  • DX/DXL24, DX/DXL424, DX/DXL216
  • ACM7 seismic clips and lateral force bracing

We Rumbled. They Tumbled.

USG Suspension System Seismic Solutions went head-to-head against Armstrong’s seismic ceiling system at the Earthquake Engineering Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley. Both systems were tested on an Earthquake Simulator machine, a piece of equipment that’s made to shake. Really shake.

The results the test showed are truly dramatic. We took the required standard and turned the dial—all the way up to a realistic seismic event at the Berkeley facility. And we still passed. The competition, however, did not.

* The USG system was tested at 2.5 psf at the Buffalo, New York, testing facility and at 4.1 psf at the Berkeley, California, facility. Competitive will come from the Buffalo facility.

CLOSE WINDOW